Movies, art, and reality
OK, so it's old news. But I just discovered, by chance,
an interesting (and good) review of Brokeback Mountain, written by a gay man. He complains that the director didn't get gay men as actors, and asks why, when they're readily available? My response: actors need to believe they can act any role, in the same way that writers need to believe (and need the public to believe) they can get into anyone's head and write their lives. Did Agatha Christie (or Ruth Rendell, for a better example) need to murder anyone in order to write a murder mystery? Why does an actor need to BE gay in order to portray a gay man? All that artists like writers and actors need is empathy. The part of society that does not have empathy and does not believe it exists are the people who clap their hands to their foreheads and say "Oh, nobody knows the trouble I seen! Nobody understands me!" If the actor fails, then it's because she or he didn't do their research.
